Tuesday, February 19, 2008

A Warm Invite

There is certainly a plethora of terms and theory crammed into Epstein's introduction, which prepares us for a text steeped in theory. I still feel uncertain of some terminology and believe that a more solid understanding will occur after a class dissection and examination of these terms. However, the latest post made me revisit my fieldnotes and conceptualize what I noticed and recorded in regard to Epstein's introduction. My first, formal field observation was conducted on February 15 at 7:00. This was inconvenient for me, but a strategic move to maintain the purity of the church's youth. This is an ideal time for a youth service because during this time on a Friday night temptation and sin run rampant in the streets. Aside from my apparent gripe with the time, I was awestruck by both the facility and number of youth in attendance. Everyone was approaching me and inquiring about why I was here and how I learned about their church. I could easily give a vivid account of the jovial youth, their heavy and costly reliance on technology, and snippets from my skeptical, internal monologue, but I won't for several reasons. What I will share is the lack of "resistance" among these youth. They were not angered, boisterous, rebellious, calloused, etc. They didn't appear judgemental and eagerly approached me; excited that another prospect had stumbled upon their church. The few that I conversed with spoke in a respectful, almost revered tone for their pastor. They also talked highly of other church elders and didn't disclose any grievances they had agaisnt adults. In fact, the way in which I overheard thirteen year olds facetiously conversing with twenty something year olds accentuated this accepting, welcoming subculture. I could not detect any resentment or reservation among these teens. I felt as though they viewed adults not as their enemy, but rather as their ally. This is plausible once I saw how the youth interacted during the sermon. They were empowered and given voice when they were handed the microphone. Two youth read scripture and one even proceeded with a short oration! The minister also acted as though he was having dialogue with a youth, albeit, the youth simply acquiesced by repeatedly nodding his head. Even so, sitting down with a youth, breaking bread with them (nachos and soda), and then closing the conversation with a tight embrace helps persuade the youth that the adults are on their side. They didn't feel excluded from the adult world, but instead included. This involvement in the adult world is a rare occurence and certainly would alter one's feelings towards adults. We can certainly debate whether they are innocently included or included as part of a greater scheme, but this debate and the adults' intent is irrelevant to this issue. What is relevant, however, is how youth are invited into the adult realm and feel appreciated rather than rejected by adults. This welcoming approach is how adults can pull the wool over eyes and mollify resistance. They become our friends, not our foes.

1 comment:

Dr. Cook said...

Hi Brandon,

I thought I'd finally take the plunge and respond directly to your thoughtful musings and insights for this week, especially in light of the reading we're doing in class. So, the line I found most powerful from your current post is this: "I felt as though they viewed adults not as their enemy, but rather as their ally." In the world of youth subcultures, this is truly a rare occurrence. Adults as the allies of youth? Since when? Only in the church? What happens when our "civilian" identities are back on and in full swing out on the streets? Does the reverence carry over beyond the church? Does that alliance with adults spill out onto the streets of Lincoln? We've certainly talked and read a lot about youth and resistance. It brings to mind, for me, the image of Jimmy, the disenfranchised youth of Quadrophenia, on the beach at Brighton staging a performative "rumble" against the rockers. Why? Because they were rebelling. Against what? Nothing in particular. "The Man," in general. Rebellion and youth have been linked for...well...forever. So, what's up with this perceived alliance between youth and adults within the walls of this church? Can you take it at face value? Is it a facade, a performance? These questions lead me to wonder about the motivations of these youth in joining/participating in this Youth Group. Why are they there? Of their own volition? To "earn" their weekly allowance? In order to be allowed to go on a date Saturday night? Because they truly feel a strong connection to God and want to keep that connection strong? I am excited for you to conduct some interviews (it's coming!) so that you can better understand, from the perspectives of youth, WHY.

And, though it WAS annoying, I am sure, to attend this meeting on the Friday following Valentine's Day, I agree that the meeting was strategically scheduled. IT TOTALLY CONNECTS TO CONCEPTS IN CHP. 2 OF EPSTEIN, especially the commodification of teen bodies ("We don't know WHAT they'll do with their bodies if left alone and free on a Friday night!"). Adults fear teen sexuality, as argued by Giroux, and so adults find ways to keep teens "penned up" or at least supervised during the times they're most likely to "roam." Hmmm. So, given this scenario, who is afraid of whom here? The plot thickens...